Is notifying the user via a Message Box activity a good way to keep track of a workflow's execution progress?

Notifying the user via a Message Box activity can indeed be disruptive, which is why this choice aligns with understanding typical workflow execution progress management. While it's true that a Message Box can provide feedback, frequent interruptions can hinder users' ability to follow the flow of the process and may become more of a distraction than a tool for clarity.

Effective tracking of workflow execution is ideally done through less intrusive methods, such as logging, which allows the user to review the process without interrupting their tasks. Combining notifications with log activities is also a better practice, as it allows users to be informed about critical issues while maintaining a smoother workflow.

In the context of critical errors, while it may be appropriate to use a Message Box, it is not advisable as a general method for tracking progress. Instead, maintaining a log of overall workflow operations can better serve to keep users informed without excessive disruptions, making the message box an unnecessary element for regular progress self-tracking.