What does a good naming convention for workflows typically reflect?

A good naming convention for workflows typically reflects the function or purpose of the workflow. This approach helps to improve the clarity and organization of the workflow repository. When names are descriptive of what the workflow does, it becomes easier for team members and stakeholders to understand its role and functionality at a glance.

For example, a workflow named "InvoiceProcessing" immediately indicates that it is related to managing or handling invoices, which facilitates better collaboration and maintenance. This makes it easier for developers, testers, and business users to locate and utilize the correct workflows without having to open and inspect each one individually.

Furthermore, naming workflows based on their function aids in standardization across projects, allowing teams to follow consistent patterns that enhance workflow management and minimize confusion. In contrast, naming conventions that rely on personal identifiers, like developers' initials, or random words do not convey meaningful information about the workflow, which can lead to difficulties in tracking, understanding, and maintaining processes efficiently.