Which of the following is a suitable name for a workflow?

A suitable name for a workflow should be descriptive, conveying the purpose of the workflow clearly to anyone who might read it. In this case, "GetCustomerNumber.xaml" accurately reflects a specific task that the workflow aims to accomplish—retrieving the customer number. This clarity is beneficial for collaboration and maintenance, as it allows developers and other users to understand the intent of the workflow at a glance.

Other options, while they may be functional, do not provide the same level of specificity. "RunProcess.xaml" is too vague as it does not indicate what process is being run. "CustomerData.xaml" is slightly better but still lacks clarity on what operations are being performed with the customer data. "Workflow1.xaml" is the least descriptive—the generic numbering does not convey any information about the workflow's functionality or purpose, which can hinder understanding in a larger project context. Overall, a descriptive name like "GetCustomerNumber.xaml" not only improves clarity but also aligns with best practices in workflow development.