Which of the following is a good example of a workflow name?

A good workflow name should be descriptive and convey the purpose of the workflow clearly. In this case, "GetCostumerNumber.xaml" effectively communicates that the workflow is designed to retrieve a customer number. This level of clarity helps both the developer and any potential reviewers quickly understand what the workflow is intended to do just by looking at its name.

Descriptive names like this aid in managing and maintaining the automation process, making it easier to identify specific workflows among many. Meanwhile, the other options, while potentially acceptable, lack the same level of specificity. For example, "Process1.xaml" and "Workflow-A.xaml" do not provide insight into the actual function or the tasks being executed, which could lead to confusion, especially in a complex environment with multiple workflows. "MyWorkflow.xaml" is similarly vague and does not reflect any particular function.

Overall, a descriptive naming convention, as demonstrated by "GetCostumerNumber.xaml," enhances clarity and maintainability within RPA development projects.